1. Forums
Latest Threads

Forum Statistics
  • Forum posts:216
  • Forum threads:78
  • Members:1,430
  • Latest member:Daryna

  Why Some FC 26 Players Got Banned and What You Should Do Instead

Posted by: katharineee
10-16-2025, 07:27 AM
Forum: General
- No Replies

EA Sports FC 26 recently faced one of its biggest community controversies yet—a regional pricing glitch that turned into a full-blown exploit. Some players used VPNs to access cheaper prices and stockpile FC Points, leading to suspensions and bans that rocked the Ultimate Team scene.

How the VPN Exploit Worked

Normally, FC Points in EA Sports FC 26 cost about $1 per 100 points. But an error in Indonesia’s in-game store mispriced the currency at a fraction of the correct amount. Instead of 2 million rupiah per pack, the listing showed just 2,000 rupiah—barely the price of a snack.

Players quickly realized that connecting through a VPN set to Indonesia allowed them to buy thousands of FC Points for only a few dollars. Within hours, the exploit spread through Reddit and social media, creating an unfair flood of players with supercharged teams.

EA’s Crackdown and Community Reaction

Once EA noticed the problem, they moved quickly. The incorrect listings were removed, and affected accounts were flagged for suspicious activity.
Those caught exploiting the pricing bug received either temporary suspensions or permanent bans, depending on how severely they abused the system.

Many fans supported the decision, saying that exploiting glitches damages the competitive integrity of Ultimate Team. “It’s cheating, plain and simple,” one Reddit user wrote. “If you can afford to play, you can afford to play fair.”

Instead of exploiting loopholes, consider a safe and legal option to Buy FC 26 CD Keys at Z2U.COM. Z2U is a trusted platform offering fast delivery, verified sellers, and affordable prices for gamers around the world.

Was It EA’s Fault or Apple’s?

Some players, however, pointed fingers at Apple Pay. Reports suggest that while scanning codes, Apple Pay initially displayed the correct prices but processed them incorrectly after confirmation. If true, the issue might not have been entirely EA’s fault—but it was the publisher who bore the backlash.

Regardless, both companies have since addressed the issue, restoring correct pricing and preventing future misuse.

Using VPNs for gaming can sometimes help improve ping or protect your IP, but when used for price manipulation, it’s a clear violation of EA’s policies. The risk simply isn’t worth it, especially when there are legitimate, cost-effective ways to play.

With your Cheap FC 26 Ultimate Edition from Z2U.COM, you can enjoy full access to Ultimate Team, Career Mode, and online play—without risking a ban or losing your progress.

Print this item

  Bug: Keyboard does not hide when clicking away on mobile

Posted by: marktalluto
03-07-2025, 07:01 PM
Forum: Bug Reports
- No Replies

We recently switched from LC 9.6.13 to LC 10.0.1. We found a regression in LC 10 that breaks the mobile keyboard from hiding when you click away. We filed a bug report with LC. Until it is fixed, we will switch back to LC 9.6.13 for the Appli Player engines for mobile devices. I am sorry we missed that in our testing. Next week's iOS and Android builds will resolve the issue.

-Mark

Print this item

  very large values for row heights in new layout containers

Posted by: stam66
02-24-2025, 11:15 AM
Forum: Bug Reports
- No Replies

Hi team

just wanted to flag that new layouts come with very high row heights (200 - 500 px) which means that if selecting 'highlight alternate rows' you won't see any rows until the row height is made reasonable!

I have been occasionally checking in on Appli and am considering this now for a new project - this was the reason I coundln't see rows in multi-line layouts Wink

Many thanks
Stam

Print this item

  Unexpected resizing label fields inside a form

Posted by: stam66
01-14-2025, 05:23 PM
Forum: Bug Reports
- No Replies

Hi team,

not sure if this expected behaviour or not, but it's not useful...

I am creating a moderate complexity form which has 30+ controls in it (with the help of a tab control). Everything has a label. Everything looked good.

Then I decided to just resize the screen/stack/window: The form unexpectedly resized with it, but but was a bit worse is that the label fields (not the controls themselves) changed their text size. But only to smaller size, so I have a bunch of labels inside groups inside and outside of a tab control inside a a form that I need to resize - and be careful not to resize the window ever again! 

Here's what it looks like (the label font size is 6 when it should be 14):
   

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug/incorrect behaviour?
Many thanks
Stam

Print this item

  Howdeee

Posted by: tomglod
01-14-2025, 12:45 AM
Forum: Introduce Yourself
- No Replies

Hey Hey Everybody. I keep forgetting to do this, but not today!

My name is Tom I work on Appli's development team.
I've been here for 3 years, I've taken part in growing Appli's featureset, and I've watched Appli mature into where it is today.

I'm available to help  with any Appli topics or queries.
You can email me tom (@) canelasoftware.com

Cheers,

Tom

Print this item

  Unable to use Switch element to control object

Posted by: stam66
01-07-2025, 11:42 AM
Forum: Bug Reports
- Replies (1)

Dear team,

I wanted to use a switch control to manually set the passwordField property of a field to True|False.

On the face of it this should be simple but does not seem to work. I have to toggle the switch twice to change the property once, with the result that it's not possible to really control this with logic.

This is my code, for a field password with it's passwordField set to true, and switch element called showPassword:
   

This alternative code has the same issue:
   

Either I'm doing something wrong (but for the life of me I can't see it) or this is a bug...

This makes using Switch element unusable...
Any suggestions?

Many thanks,
Stam

Print this item

  Login control - reset password functionality?

Posted by: stam66
10-16-2024, 07:16 PM
Forum: General
- Replies (3)

Hi all,

Quick question - Does Appli have a "reset password" functionality similar to  cdb_forgotUserAccountPassword in LiveCloud? (still undocumented btw!)

If not I presume it's possible to add as a code block - but would that work without having the LiveCloud libraries?

Many thanks
Stam

Print this item

  LiveCode licence needed?

Posted by: stam66
10-11-2024, 01:26 AM
Forum: General
- Replies (3)

Hi Mark & team

I have a recollection that when Appli was first announced, there was a requirement to have a LiveCode licence as well (please do correct me if I'm miss-remembering).

Quick question: Is that still la requirement? 
If so, how does that work with the multiple licences and changes in LiveCode which is now being sunsetted in 3 years, to be replaced with LiveCode Create? (a little bit academic right now as for the foreseeable future I will have a liveCode licence anyway)

Many thanks
Stam

Print this item

  Script as text

Posted by: stam66
10-11-2024, 01:13 AM
Forum: Feature Requests
- Replies (1)

Hi Team
One thing that has become very apparent when trying to share scripts on this forum: there is no way to do this without a screenshot - or re-typing everything manually.

The current lowcode interface is nice, and promotes feeling simplicity - but is not always the most practical. 
- The script does take up a lot of screen real estate so longer scripts are more difficult to visualise. 
- There is no way that I know of as yet anyway to take a copy of the script as actual text, for example to paste in the forums, or share with others.

Feature request: would it be possible to create an alternate layout where the script simply appears as text (even if it can't be modified by typing and is used as it is now) with the ability to copy/paste this on forums or elsewhere like gist/github?
Or at least implement a function to copy the current script as text?

Many thanks once again,
Stam

Print this item

  BLOBs: Multiple feature requests

Posted by: stam66
10-11-2024, 12:59 AM
Forum: Feature Requests
- Replies (5)

Hi team

first of all thank you for the fixes just pushed - list files works perfectly.

The intention with the lowcode script I was trying to use this in was to
1. browse a folder containing mp4 videos
2. upload them to the cloud for use in an app.
 
The first request is an issue I've had with LiveCloud as well: uploading a blob does not retain the filename or modifiable metadata for the file and essentially just contains a UUID and an extension. Therefore working with BLOBs is not possible unless I also create a kind of join table to include the BLOB UUID and metadata, whereas this could be solved easily by including the filename as a key in the cdbBlobs table. This is fine and it works but is extra work.

In Appli, this script uploads the BLOBs and populates a separate table with their IDs and filenames. This works but may not be the most efficient:
   

So the first question is: can I use blobType in livecloud with the filename instead of the extension to make up for this? (I attempted to create. new key in the cdbBlobs table but that caused catastrophic errors only solved when I deleted the project...).
The second question is: was there an easier way to achieve the tasks shown in the script above?

If not, then the first feature request is: would it be possible to consider adding a "description" key in cdbBlobs that could for example be populated with the filename by default?



Another issue I've had with BLOBs is that create blob has been implemented as a non-blocking action - but there is as far as I can see no way to set up a callback/notification for when upload has been completed. Since there is no batch upload in Appli (as far as I can see), that means this is a stepwise process and there is no way for the app to know when the process has been completed.

So my second feature request is: please consider implementing callbacks for BLOB actions in Appli and BLOB handlers in LiveCloud 
As far as I can see there is no easy way to periodically poll this from Appli so I dont' think I can work around this; and in LiveCode + LiveCloud it would mean setting up a recurring handler to check if the number of records in LiveCloud matches the number of records the handler knows it has uploaded - again a lot of extra and possibly error-prone work.

If adding a callback isn't feasible, is it possible to have an option to make this a blocking action, so the script cannot proceed until upload is complete?

Many thanks once again,
Stam

Print this item


  1. Forums